G.R. No. 161032. September 16, 2008 (Case Brief / Digest)
2024年4月10日 · On September 8, 1999, four separate informations were filed at the Regional Trial Court (RTC) in Pasay City against Erwin Tulfo, Susan Cambri, Rey Salao, Jocelyn Barlizo, and Philip Pichay, associated with the daily tabloid Remate, for libel concerning articles published in Tulfo’s column “Direct Hit.”
G.R. No. 161032, September 16, 2008 - ERWIN TULFO, Petitioner, …
2008年9月16日 · WHEREFORE, the Court finds the accused ERWIN TULFO, SUSAN CAMBRI, REY SALAO, JOCELYN BARLIZO, and PHILIP PICHAY guilty beyond reasonable doubt of four (4) counts of the crime of LIBEL, as defined in Article 353 of the Revised Penal Code, and sentences EACH of the accused to pay a fine of SIX THOUSAND PESOS (PhP …
Penalty for libel limited to fine; damages awarded. - Blogger
2008年9月16日 · Under Art. 360 of the RPC, as Tulfo, the author of the subject articles, has been found guilty of libel, so too must Cambri, Salao, Barlizo, and Pichay.
G.R. No. 161032 - Tulfo vs. People - Jur.ph
The Supreme Court dismissed the petitions filed by Erwin Tulfo and his co-accused, affirming the Court of Appeals' decision. The Court upheld the finding of guilt for libel against all petitioners, confirming that the articles were defamatory and published with reckless disregard for the truth.
G.R. No. 219603 - The Lawphil Project
WHEREFORE, the Court finds the accused ERWIN TULFO, SUSAN CAMBRI, REY SALAO, JOCELYN BARLIZO, and PHILIP PICHAY guilty beyond reasonable doubt of four (4) counts of the crime of LIBEL, as defined in Article 353 of the Revised Penal Code, and sentences EACH of the accused to pay a fine of SIX THOUSAND PESOS (PhP 6,000) per count of libel with ...
Erwin Tulfo vs People of the Philippines - Uber Digests
2021年4月19日 · On appeal before the Supreme Court, Tulfo argued that his newspaper articles were covered by the doctrine of qualified privileged communication which provides that fair commentaries on matters of public interest are privileged and constitute a valid defense in an action for libel or slander.
Erwin Tulfo vs. People, 587 Phil. 64 (2008) - Blogger
In a Decision dated November 17, 2000, the RTC found petitioners guilty of the crime of Libel. In a Decision dated June 17, 2003, the Eighth Division of the CA dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment of the trial court. Issue: Whether or not Tulfo’s articles are qualified privileged communications. Held: No. Ratio:
Erwin Tulfo vs. People - MyLegalWhiz
There is a fine line between freedom of expression and libel, and it falls on the courts to determine whether or not that line has been crossed. The Facts. On the complaint of Atty. Carlos "Ding" So of the Bureau of Customs, four (4) separate informations were filed on September 8, 1999 with the Regional Trial Court in (RTC) Pasay City.
G.R. No. 205039 - The Lawphil Project
On May 23, 2012, Erwin Tulfo filed a Manifestation and Motion to Deny Issuance of Protection Order and/or Dismissal of the Petition Motu Proprio8 (May 23, 2012 Motion) which was opposed by petitioners for being a prohibited pleading.9
Atty. Manuel J. Laserna Jr.: Press freedom; Journalists Code
1999年1月14日 · In his appeal, Tulfo claims that the CA erred in not applying the ruling in Borjal v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 126466, January 14, 1999, 301 SCRA 1. In essence, he argues that the subject articles fall under qualifiedly privileged communication under Borjal and that the presumption of malice in Art. 354 of the RPC does not apply.